Fixing What Ain't Broke: The New Norm of Fixed Date Elections in Canada

Main Article Content

Griffyn Geoffrey Chezenko

Abstract

Since 2001, legislation implementing fixed dates for general elections has been passed by the federal government, and most provincial and territorial governments. The notion that general election dates are now fixed, however, is flawed. In my submission to Changing Political Landscapes, I will explore the fledgling norm of fixed date elections in Canada and examine the aspects of the legislation which call into doubt the fixedness of these elections. With a review of the literature on the subject, I begin by inquiring into the emergence of this foreign phenomenon into Canadian electoral politics and the justification for its extensive adoption. Comparing the legislation across jurisdictions, I analyze the basic construct of fixed date election legislation in Canada, survey similarities and differences, and discover how fixed dates for elections are ultimately avoidable. As a result, I find that election dates are not truly fixed in Canadian jurisdictions where fixed date election legislation has been enacted.

Article Details

Section
Articles
Author Biography

Griffyn Geoffrey Chezenko, Memorial University of Newfoundland

I am a Master's candidate in political science, interested in elections, voting, political parties, and party systems.  I am particularly drawn to the study of Canadian provincial politics.