Material and Animal Agency in Inuit Ontology: How Inuit People could Speak with Polar Bears
AbstractOntological analyses of archaeological remains have provided archaeologists with new insight on how to effectively interpret past peoples. By considering recent alternative methods of interpretation in experimental archaeology, and in ethnographic analyses, I argue that ontological analyses present an opportunity for archaeologists to reconcile western interpretations of the past with those of Inuit people to create a more inclusive and considerate archaeological practice. This argument rests on the assertion that multiple ontologies, and thus multiple realities, exist in our world, and that no single ontology is more correct than any other. Using this premise, I explain how an Inuit tale in which people and polar bears were not mutually exclusive beings is valid from the point of view of western academia in order to re-establish the legitimacy of Inuit oral traditions in academic interpretation.
D’Anglure, Bernard Saladin
Nanook, Super-Male: The Polar Bear in the Imaginary Space and Social Time of
the Inuit of the Canadian Arctic. In Signifying Animals: Human Meaning in the Natural
World, edited by Roy Willis, pp. 169-185. Routledge, London.
The Ontology and Epistemology of Walking: Animality in Karsten Heuer’s Being
Caribou: Five Months on Foot with an Arctic Herd. In Greening the Maple: Canadian
Ecocriticism in Context, edited by Ella Soper and Nicholas Bradley, pp. 407-437.
University of Calgary Press, Calgary.
Betts, Matthew W.
Seven Focal Economies for Six Focal Places: The Development of Economic
Diversity in the Western Canadian Arctic. Arctic Anthropology 42(1):47-87.
The Mackenzie Inuit Whale Bone Industry: Raw Material, Tool Manufacture,
Scheduling, and Trade. Arctic 60(2):129-144.
Castro, Damian, Kamrul Hossaln, and Carolina Tytelman
Arctic Ontologies: Reframing the Relationship Between Humans and Rangifer.
Polar Geography 32(9):98-112.
Inuit Place Names and Sense of Place. In Critical Inuit Studies: An Anthology of
Contemporary Arctic Ethnography, edited by Pamela R. Stern and Lisa Stevenson, pp.
-205. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln.
Colwell-Chanthaphonh, Chip, T. J. Ferguson, Dorothy Lippert, Randall H. McGuire, George P. Nicholas, Joe E. Watkins and Larry T. Zimmerman
The Premise and Promise of Indigenous Archaeology. American Antiquity
Harris, Oliver J. T., and John Robb
Multiple Ontologies and the Problem of the Body in History. American
Animals as Agents: Hunting Ritual and Relational Ontologies in Prehistoric Alaska
and Chukotka. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 21(3):407-426.
Toward an Analytical and Methodological Understanding of Actor-Network
Theory. Journal of Arts and Humanities 4(2):29-44.
Archaeological Theory: An Introduction. 2nd Edition. Wiley-Blackwell,
MacKay, Glen, Adrian L. Burke, Gilles Gauthier, and Charles D. Arnold
Mackenzie Inuit Lithic Raw Material Procurement in the Lower Mackenzie Valley:
The Importance of Social Factors. Arctic 66(4):483-499.
Aboriginalism and the Problems of Indigenous Archaeology. American Antiquity
Stewart, Andrew M., Darren Keith, and Joan Scottie
Caribou Crossings and Cultural Meanings: Placing Traditional Knowledge and
Archaeology in Context in an Inuit Landscape. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 11:183-211.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo
The Relative Native. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3(3):469-502.
Saving Indigenous Peoples From Ourselves: Separate but Equal Archaeology is
Not Scientific Archaeology. American Antiquity 75(2):221-227.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).