Scholarly Reception of Sulpicia: A Victim of Early Sexist Scholarship
AbstractThe poetry of Sulpicia, the lone extant female author amongst the Latin love elegists, has been unjustly criticized and viewed as frivoulous amongst scholars. However, Sulpicia's work demonstates a level of skill and technique which is comparable to her male counterparts. Despite this the sexism which characterised the work of early scholars has stained Sulpicia's poetry resulted in it being viewed as inferior.
Fear, Trevor. “Propertian Closure: The Elegiac Inscription of the Liminal Male and Ideological Contestation in Augustan Rome.” In Gendered Dynamics in Latin Love Elegy. Edited by R. Ancona and E. Greene.13-40. John Hopkins, 2005.
Green, Peter. Ovid: The Erotic Poems. London: Penguin Books, 1982.
Green, Peter. The Poems of Catullus: A Bilingual Edition. Berkley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005.
Hallett, Judith P. “Sulpicia and Her Fama: An Intertextual Approach to Recovering her Latin Literary Image.” The Classical World 100, no. 1 (2006): 37-42.
Hubbard, Thomas K. “The Invention of Sulpicia.” The Classical Journal 100, no. 2 (2004): 177-194.
Katz, Vincent. The Complete Elegies of Sextus Propertius. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2004.
Keith, Allison. “Corpus Eroticum: Elegiac Poetics and Elegiac Puellae in Ovid's ‘Amores’.” The Classical World 88, no. 1 (1994): 27-40.
Keith, Allison. “Tandem Venit Amor: A Roman Woman Speaks of Love.” In Roman Sexualities, edited by Judith P. Hallett and Marilyn B Skinner, 295-310. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1997.
Lombardo, Stanley. Virgil’s Aeneid. Edited by W.R. Johnson. Indianapolis and Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, 2005.
Lowe, Nick. “Sulpicia’s Syntax”. Classical Quarterly 38 (1988): 193-205.
Merriam, Carol. “Sulpicia: Just Another Roman Poet.” The Classical World 100, no. 1 (2006): 11-15.
Milnor, Kristina. Gender Domesticity, and the Age of Augustus: Inventing Private Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
Postgate, J.P. “Tibullus.” In Catullus, Tibullus, and Pervigilium Veneris, edited by G. P. Goold, et al. 2nd ed. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1988.
Roessel, David. “The Significance of the Name Sulpicia in the Poems of Sulpicia.” Transactions of the American Philological Association 120 (1990): 243-250.
Santirocco, Matthew. “Sulpicia Reconsidered.” The Classical Journal 74, no. 3 (1979): 229-239.
Sharrock, Alison. “The poeta-amator, nequitia, and recusatio. In The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy, edited by Thea S. Thorson, 151-165. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Smith, Kirby Flower. The Elegies of Albius Tibullus. Cincinnati and New York: American Book Company, 1914.
Skoie, Mathilde. Reading Sulpicia: Commentaries 1475-1990. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Skoie, Mathilde. “The Woman.” In The Cambridge Companion to Latin Love Elegy, edited by Thea S. Thorson, 83-96. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
Whitaker, Richard. “Apropos of the New Gallus Fragment.” Acta Classica 24 (1981): 87-95.
Wyke, Maria. “Mistress and Metaphor in Augustan Elegy.” Helios 16: 25-47. Reprinted in Latin Erotic Elegy: An Anthology and Reader, edited by P.A. Miller, 386-409. Routledge, 2002.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).