Interpretation and the Indefinability of Truth in Heidegger and Davidson
Heidegger famously diminishes the significance of everyday theories of truth like the correspondence theory, disparaging these as a matter of ‘mere’ correctness.
They are among the starting points that lead to ‘the true’ but are not themselves genuine or authentic. Donald Davidson develops a theory of interpretation that suggests some reasons why the ordinary senses of truth should not be so mistreated: responsible theories of interpretation should treat the everyday senses of truth more seriously. This paper argues that the necessity of convention T as a condition of interpretation means that correctness is essential both in philosophy and elsewhere.
Full Text:Full Article
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License.
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HERMENEUTICS / INSTITUT INTERNATIONAL D'HERMÉNEUTIQUE